Background and Aims: In jurisprudence, apparent contracts are considered as those contracts that seem to meet the necessary conditions for validity, but in reality there is no real agreement between the parties or the intentions and intentions of the parties on these contracts are different. This study aims to show how jurisprudential and legal rulings regarding apparent contracts affect social behaviors and what legal and social consequences they entail.
Materials and Methods: This research is of a theoretical type and has been carried out using a descriptive-analytical method.
Ethical Considerations: In this research, the principles of trustworthiness, honesty, neutrality and originality of the work have been respected..
Findings: It is important to recognize the social effects of apparent contracts on society and relationships between prominent individuals, because this type of contract plays an important role in promoting trust, maintaining the security of transactions, and preventing pretense and deception, and at the same time, it can lead to disputes and legal problems.
Conclusion: A sham contract is enforceable only if it preserves the trust and interests of third parties in conflict with the parties' inner intention; but if the parties' outward behavior demonstrates customary consent to the contract and leads to the creation of a legitimate obligation and trust for the third party, the law recognizes and defends the sham contract in order to maintain social order. This approach both protects the rights of third parties and provides a reliable method for detecting true intention and strengthening social trust.
