Background and Aim: The purpose of this article is to examine Iran's maritime law from the perspective of Imami jurisprudence.
Materials and Methods: This article is descriptive and analytical. Materials and data are also qualitative and data collection was used in collecting materials and data.
Ethical Considerations: In this article, the originality of the texts, honesty and trustworthiness are observed.
Findings: The findings showed that some of the articles of this law are silent on jurisprudence issues, while others are incomplete and contradictory, but most of its articles not only have no contradictions, but sometimes they are completely in harmony with Imami jurisprudence. In addition to the fact that this law currently needs fundamental revision and revision both in terms of its structure and legal provisions, especially in terms of its compliance with Imami jurisprudence, it also has other deficiencies and shortcomings such as: ignoring the position Aquatics, the regulations related to the seizure of the ship, the lack of definition of the responsibilities of the captain and the crew of the ship and the environment are harmful.
Conclusion: The conclusion is that Iran's maritime law currently needs fundamental revision and revision, both in terms of structure and legal provisions regarding its compliance with Imami jurisprudence.