Background and Aim: despite the clear jurisprudence precedents on the necessity of managing the condition his condition has, although according to Article 167 of the Constitution, will still reach the rule of jurisprudence, but unfortunately, the dispersal of opinions and Fatawa in the field of jurisprudence and dispersion and differences of opinion have imposed a worse situation than silence on rights.
Materials and Methods: This article is descriptive and analytical. Materials and data are also qualitative and data collection was used in collecting materials and data.
Ethical Considerations: In this article, the originality of the texts, honesty and trustworthiness are observed.
Findings: The findings showed that the findings showed that the legal nature of coma and the legal status of the person suffering from it do not significantly differ from each other in the Ahl al-Suntaf schools of Imami jurisprudence and the subject law of Iran. the legal, although it is not included in the ranks of the factors of hajr, but at least to the extent of the temporary status of the absent person, it is necessary to be protected by the legislator. take
Conclusion: In some documents, due to the lack of proper understanding of the subject, unconsciousness has been state of unconsciousness and unconsciousness, both of, and the effect of neither is different, this The carelessness that may have been due to the lack of progress in medical science at that time is not a bad thing.