Background and Aims: It is meant by the sequence of events that occur contrary to the normal course of proceedings, and the court must take appropriate action according to the case, and the litigants must bear the related costs. The purpose of this article is to examine the arbitration procedure and its related costs.
Materials and Methods: The research method is descriptive and analytical and this research is theoretical. The method that has been used to collect information is in the form of a library and it has been done by referring to books and articles.
Ethical Considerations: In this article, the originality of the texts, honesty and trustworthiness are respected.
Findings: Necessary conditions for filing vague claims in arbitration have not been regularly and clearly mentioned neither in domestic arbitration laws nor in other laws. Tari lawsuits face interruption (both permanent and temporary) of arbitration. There are conditions that some of them need to be followed in order to file vague claims in the courts, but these conditions are not the same in arbitrations and courts, and in general, it can be acknowledged that the conditions for filing vague claims in arbitration and courts are not the same.
Conclusion: according to the rules governing the arbitration institution to prevent the huge costs of the proceedings as well as the delay of the proceedings as well as not to face the vague claims regarding the civil proceedings and the related costs, in order to speed up the proceedings and subsequent settlement In case of dispute, it is better for litigants to go to arbitration.