Strategic Studies of Jurisprudence and Law

Strategic Studies of Jurisprudence and Law

Legislative approaches in electronic contracts in the laws of Iran and the United States of America

Document Type : research

Authors
1 PhD Student in private law, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Private Law, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.
10.22034/ejs.2024.429504.1627
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Considering the extent and difference between the legal systems of different countries, it is inevitable to comprehensively review the laws in the countries and their adaptation to Iranian laws. The purpose of this article is to examine legislative approaches in electronic contracts in the laws of Iran and the United States of America.
 
Materials and Methods: The research method is descriptive and analytical and this research is theoretical.
 
Ethical Considerations: In all stages of writing the present research, while respecting the originality of the texts, honesty and trustworthiness have been observed.
 
Findings: In the United States, the National Conference of Commissioners on the Uniform Laws of the States has established two uniform government decrees on granting legal validity to electronic transactions, which are: the Uniform Law of Computer Technology Transactions (USTA) and the Uniform Law of Electronic Transactions (Utah). Eustia covers contracts or transactions related to computer technology. A contract involving computer technology, for example a contract for the purchase of a software, can be concluded electronically or in another way.
 
Result: There is no problem regarding the place of delivery of the goods in traditional contracts where the goods are material, but in electronic contracts where sometimes the goods are digital and downloaded, it is difficult or even impossible to recognize the place of delivery. In these cases, a place must be "assumed" to fulfill the obligation.
Keywords
Subjects

  • منابع فارسی

    • جهانی، نرگس؛ اصول حاکم بر قراردادهای الکترونیک در حقوق ایران، مجله پژوهش ملل، دوره دوم و شماره هفدهم، اردیبهشت 1396.
    • رستمی، محسن؛ ساورائی، پرویز؛ چالش‌های مهم در قراردادهای الکترونیک در حقوق ایران، مجله: تحقیقات حقوق خصوصی و کیفری، شماره سی و یکم، بهار 1396.
    • رکودو، سیلویا، «رویکرد نظام حقوقی ایالات متحده آمریکا و اروپا به تشکیل قراردادهای الکترونیکی»، ترجمه ابراهیم نوشادی، ویژه نامه مجله حقوقی بین­المللی، شماره چهلم، 1389.
    • السان، مصطفی، «بررسی نحوه تعیین قانون حاکم بر قراردادهای الکترونیکی»، نشریه پژوهش حقوق و سیاست، شماره نوزدهم، 1385.
    • السان، مصطفی، «تشکیل قراردادهای الکترونیکی»، فصلنامه پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، شماره بیست و ششم، 1384.
    • سلمن، جفری سی، «فرایند تشکیل قرارداد الکترونیکی»، مترجم علی رضایی، نشریه کانون، شماره شسصت و هفتم، 1385.
    • نوری، سیدمسعود، «اصل حقوقی تجارت الکترونیکی با تأکید بر قانون تجارت الکترونیک ایران»، مجله حوزه و دانشگاه، شماره چهل و چهارم، 1384.
    • هیل، جنیفر ای؛ السان، مصطفی؛ کنعانی، زینب، « آینده قراردادهای الکترونیکی در عرصه بین­الملل: خلاها و گریزهای ذاتی کنوانسیون سازمان ملل متحد راجع به بیع بین­المللی کالا»، مجله حقوقی مرکز امور حقوقی بین المللی، شماره سی و پنجم،

    منابع لاتین

    • Boone, Brian D, "Bullseye! Why a Targeting Approach to Personal Jurisdiction in the E-Commerce Context Makes Sense Internationally", Emory International Law Review, No .20,2006.
    • Chen, C,"United States and European Union Approaches to Internet Jurisdiction and Their Impact on E-Commerce", University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, No .25,2004.
    • Luna, N H, "Implications of Singapore's Income and Consumption Tax Policies oninternational E-Commerce Transactions of Digitized Products", Pacific Rim law & policy journal,10,2001.
    • Lynne, K. Law,"National Copyright Law v. Community Law: Which Law Is Controlling In Intellectual Property Derivative Market Products?" ,Dickinson Journal of International Law,No.25,1992.
    • McCafferty, Anne, "Internet Contracting and E-Commerce Disputes: International and United States Personal Jurisdiction", The Global Business Law Review ,No. 2,2011.
    • Pappas, C, "The White House A Framework For Global Electronic Commerce", Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, No.9, 1997.