Document Type : research
Authors
1
PhD student in Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Imam Khomeini's Law and Thought, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Fiqh and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
10.22034/ejs.2024.416198.1552
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Salat and fasting are one of the important and debatable issues that have not been considered and investigated from the point of view of economic jurisprudence. The purpose of this article is to examine the evidences of obtaining wages for prayer and fasting from the point of view of economic jurisprudence.
Materials and Methods: The method of this article is descriptive and analytical. Materials and data are also qualitative and data collection was used in collecting materials and data. Ethical considerations: In this article, the originality of the text, honesty and trustworthiness are respected.
Findings: One of the problems that occurs in Salat and fasting is that taking a reward contradicts the intention of closeness, and also the rule of sanctity of taking a reward over obligations is another reason that Salat is not valid.
Result: In order to solve the problem of the intention of closeness by charging a fee, the jurists proposed solutions, but the result that can be obtained and the best solution for this problem is that when someone wants to perform prayers and fasting for the dead, it should not be for the purpose of rent and no one should. who considers a person to perform acts of worship, prayer and fasting for the dead, not to determine the wage for him, but what he gives to the wage earner in return for performing prayer and fasting should be a gift, not a wage. In this case, the above problems will be solved.
Keywords
Subjects
