Background and Aims: Under the influence of globalization, two trends of universalism and at the same time relativism of human rights are proposed. The purpose of this article is to analyze the condition of the Islamic Republic of Iran in joining the human rights documents with regard to the native culture.
Materials and Methods: This article is descriptive and analytical. Materials and data are also qualitative and data collection was used in collecting materials and data.
Ethical Considerations: In this article, the originality of the texts, honesty and trustworthiness are respected.
Findings: Acceptance and respect for indigenous culture and cultural diversity in general means respect for human rights, and in particular, paying attention to some examples of human rights, including minority rights and cultural rights. It is even possible to consider having the right to native culture and cultural diversity as one of the basic human rights. Iran's conditional right on human rights treaties can be explained on this basis, of course, Iran's conditional right is due to its vagueness and indeterminacy, as well as its contradiction with the subject and purpose of the treaties and the violation of the general principles of treaty rights, including the principle of the impossibility of invoking domestic laws and regulations for The non-implementation of the provisions of the treaties as well as the inconsistency with the unconditional ratification of the human rights treaties are objected.
Conclusion: The correct approach is that the right of bet is detailed and specific. This means that it should be announced which part of the provisions of the human rights treaties are in conflict with which laws of Iran.