Background and Aim: The priority and delay of security in achieving the ability of Hajj is one of the important issues for jurists and Islamic scholars, which in this study is addressed from the perspective of contemporary jurisprudence.
Materials and Methods: In the present study, a descriptive-analytical method and citing Imami and Sunni jurists were used to investigate the issue.
Findings: If the security of the pilgrim is not provided during the birth and the performance of the Hajj rituals, it will cause him to be unable to afford it, and as a result, the Hajj will not be obligatory for him. The jurists emphasize that affordability is a condition for the necessity of Hajj and one of its pillars is evacuation, which is the security, life, property and honor.
Ethical considerations: In conducting the present study, the principles of fidelity and honesty have been observed.
Conclusion: The multiplicity of narrations that the Ka'bah is not empty of pilgrims shows that it is up to the Islamic ruler to prevent the closure of the Hajj as much as possible. Most of the Hajj closures recorded by historians are based on a lack of security, which is based on an initial ruling. In the Holy Qur'an, God Almighty has made Hajj obligatory for those who can afford it. But he also forbade the destruction of human beings by his own hand.