Rules Governing the Reduction of Damages in the Ixed Arbitration Procedure

Rahimi, Mohammad; Ensafiazar, Behnam; Mandegar, Mostafa; Hosseinimoghadam, Mahsa

doi:10.22034/ejs.2026.472322.1908

Rules Governing the Reduction of Damages in the Ixed Arbitration Procedure

Document Type : research

Authors

Mohammad Rahimi ¹

Behnam Ensafiazar ²

Mostafa Mandegar ²

Mahsa Hosseinimoghadam ²

¹ Department of Private Law, Shi.C., Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.

² Department of Law, Shi.C., Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.

10.22034/ejs.2026.472322.1908

Abstract

Background and Aims: Damage mitigation is one of the important issues in the field of international arbitration, which is raised in the field of contracts and compulsory guarantees. The present study aims to examine the rules governing damage mitigation in the oxide arbitration procedure.
Materials and methods: The method of this article is analytical and descriptive, and the research tool is library.
Ethical considerations: In writing this article, documented referencing and trustworthiness have been the basis.
Findings: Damage reduction for the purpose of justifying logical, rational and calculating behaviors expects the claimant to adapt his/her behaviors based on preventing the spread of damage. Therefore, creating a kind of prediction to negate further damage is one of the important achievements of damage reduction in the Xide arbitration procedure. Therefore, abuse of rights and proceedings and the attempt to reduce damage against the injured party is the achievement of Xide arbitration.
Result: The important outcome of the IXID arbitration is to prevent unnecessary losses, prevent unfair trials by governments against foreign nationals, including investors, advise claimants to avoid further losses and widespread damage, ensure the reproducibility of decisions for fair trials, and create accountability for the injured party.

Keywords

excidence

arbitration

damage reduction

proceedings

damage

Subjects